996 results found

1. Quick Match - QM should not be limited to 40 templates

   QM is how many warzone players discover strategic game play. And learning new maps and templates adds to that enjoyment.

   Many great maps and templates don't currently exist in QM. This includes templates on the MTL ladder and recent seasonal ladder selections.

   So, why not expand QM well beyond just 40 templates? And perhaps hard-wire in all the MTL templates?

   Anyone who is satisfied with current choices can veto new templates.
   So this is really just upside for those wishing for more RT options.

   70 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. Open Clans - Enforce Prerequisites

   We should be able to create prerequisites for joining an open clan, similar to the ones you can use for an open game.

   For example, my clan requires all new members to be above level 10 but we have no way of enforcing that besides manually removing anyone who joins and is at a level below that.

   20 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

3. Poll for ladder bootimes

   An ingame poll (as suggested by fizzer in the AMA) about peoples ladder bootime preferences

   14 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. Using Mods in the Custom Scenario Builder

   Currently, Warzone has 2 amazing features: Mods and Custom Scenarios. The biggest thing that is missing, in my opinion, is the compatibility between the two...

   For those who don't want to read everything below, this is my suggestion. Update the custom scenario builder to include mod compatibility.

   Hi, I'm JustADutchman_ and have been playing Warzone for more than 2 years now. Most players know me from my mods and the effort I put into the modded Warzone scene/community. One thing that I've always tried is to engage every player with mods, whatever community they're in.

   Warzone mods can support/enhance every community, game, and tournament. We have strategic mods (Capture The Flag, Connected Territories), mods that are really convenient to use (Local Deployment Helper), and even some mods that enhance custom scenarios (Advanced Card Distribution, Dragons, Structures Distribution). But, for the latter community, it is really difficult to create mods. That is, we don't have any tools to make mods for it, which makes the usage of the mods really awkward.

   Here's my feature request: Update the custom scenario builder to make it compatible with mods.

   With "compatible", I mean allow mods to modify, add or remove armies, structures, or custom units. Here is how I see it could be done:

   When you open the custom scenario builder, somewhere on the left side it will have a new option: [Include Mod]. When you click on this button, a list of mods will show up that meet a certain requirement (I will get back on this requirement later), and you can pick a mod that will be included in the game + the custom scenario builder. If needed, a window pops up where you need to take some actions in order to configure the mod (mod settings and such). If you have included 1 or more mods, a new option becomes available: [Mod Action] (I'm really bad at names, so sorry for that xD).

   At this point, we already have (some) tools to modify anything we want, the custom scenario builder just needs to support having structures and other special units than commanders. That's all for the custom scenario builder.

   For the mods, the requirement that they need to meet is to have implemented a certain, new mod hook: Client_CustomScenarioConfigureUI. The arguments given to this hook need to give at least access to the custom scenario, a RootParent, UI and WL libraries, and the Mod.Settings storage (read-only).

   This mod hook will create a dialog similar to a mod menu but is called while creating a custom scenario. In this dialog, mods can do their magic with the tools they already can write to the custom scenario.

   This above is of course my implementation and Fizzer can pick whatever implementation he wants, but I just want to let you all know that this is possible. Please leave behind any questions you have, I'll try to answer them as best as I can. Also please vote on this post, this should have been added a long time ago...

   Currently, Warzone has 2 amazing features: Mods and Custom Scenarios. The biggest thing that is missing, in my opinion, is the compatibility between the two...

   For those who don't want to read everything below, this is my suggestion. Update the custom scenario builder to include mod compatibility.

   Hi, I'm JustADutchman_ and have been playing Warzone for more than 2 years now. Most players know me from my mods and the effort I put into the modded Warzone scene/community. One thing that I've always tried is to engage every player with mods, whatever community they're in.

   Warzone mods can… more

   21 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

5. 60-70 Player Custom Scenario Games

   We need to see a 60 player or greater supported Normal Mode. The Mega Game is great, but it's expensive and the most important issue is the lack of custom scenario in that mode. I create diplomacy games and can't make them as complex as I would like because I simply don't have enough slots to set the scenario adequately. If we could have 60-100 players and be able to set a custom scenario, I could ask for nothing more from this already great game. I'd be willing to pay for it, but with no custom scenario option for mega games the option doesn't even exist.

   We need to see a 60 player or greater supported Normal Mode. The Mega Game is great, but it's expensive and the most important issue is the lack of custom scenario in that mode. I create diplomacy games and can't make them as complex as I would like because I simply don't have enough slots to set the scenario adequately. If we could have 60-100 players and be able to set a custom scenario, I could ask for nothing more from this already great game. I'd be willing to pay for it, but with no custom scenario option for mega… more

   36 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

6. Community Level Statistics

   See your stats on community levels you've created. Things such as:
   * Your "like" score -- average of likes / level from levels you've created
   * Hardest level
   * Easiest level
   * Most played level
   * Least played level
   * Most liked level
   * Least liked level
   * See a scoreboard based on your "like" score. (Must have created at least 5 levels to qualify to be on the scoreboard.)

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

7. Poll for ladder bootimes

   An ingame poll (as suggested by fizzer in the AMA) about peoples ladder bootime preferences

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

8. Clan Wars Coin Prize

   Make coin distribution in the Clan proportional to #wins.

   Members contribute differently.

   While every one with a Win gets the territory rewards, the coin should be proportional to the number of wins. This prevents members with 1 win getting as much as those with 15 wins.

   11 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

9. Quickmatch templates raised from 40 to 50

   I would like the 40 quickmatch templates to be raised to 50 for more versatile map/template options, for example. I made a template of the united kingdom of Israel map and one for Matharin and Liboa. Simple competitive templates/maps. More options to play from in my opinion. Thank you very much.

   I think most people play warzone because of qm. I feel like we need more and better templates. I think raising it from 40 to 50 is a good idea to help generate more attention to quickmatch.

   9 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

10. Player list in alphabetic order

    Hi, I would like to see the player list of the sanctions card dialog to be sorted alphabetically.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

11. 1 v 1 real-time (Auto Game)

    Please bring back old look of this game (map), do not change something what is simply good.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

12. Secondary Open Seats

    Let the game host add another type of open seat with different prerequisites. Allow at least 3 types in a game. Make one of the prerequisites: from clan XY. If you are from clan XY and there is a game with an open seat with a prerequisite of being from clan XY, make the game pop in your games as if you were invited. Let players turn off the latest mentioned feature. You can hide some of this behind membership to increase its value.

    On diplo games, there are usually big slots which require more experienced players with lower boot chance. Currently, the host has to switch players manually, which is not only annoying for the host but can be a negative experience for the switched player. Making such slots an open slot with heightened prerequisites would solve that issue.

    Prerequisite from clan XY would let the host make a team game, where anybody can join team A, but team B is joinable by their own clan. Or make a game only joinable by own clan. This would increase the value of clans.

    Let the game host add another type of open seat with different prerequisites. Allow at least 3 types in a game. Make one of the prerequisites: from clan XY. If you are from clan XY and there is a game with an open seat with a prerequisite of being from clan XY, make the game pop in your games as if you were invited. Let players turn off the latest mentioned feature. You can hide some of this behind membership to increase its value.

    On diplo games, there are usually big slots which require more experienced players with lower boot… more

    24 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

13. Matchmake Clan Wars based on individual ratings

    This proposal would make Clan Wars matches more enjoyable, Clan Wars more inclusive, and clans more robust.

    Clan Wars' performance is simply (# of matches played) * (win rate). This means an elevated win rate (>50%) has the same effect as a (win rate/50%) participation boost: a 30-member clan with a 75% win rate is as good as a 45-member 50% win rate clan.

    The problem Clan Wars' CW rating matchmaking causes here stems from a single rating not capturing a clan's skill well. Clans vary in skill: players significantly better or worse than their median clanmate get lopsided matches. Through their effect on rating, high-skill players in non-high-skill clans don't boost their clan's win rate significantly- their wins become their teammates' losses.

    At the aggregate, this means a very non-smooth distribution of win rates across clans: overall-high-skill clans break the matchmaking, while everyone else converges near 50%. This reduces parity: it's why the results have been so repetitive (with long dynasties). Only some clans benefit from high-skill players.

    This creates bad incentives for clans, which have historically invested in player development. High-skill players benefit from flocking together (like in Myth Busters or M'Hunters or the exodus from PKU58ers to MASTER) for CW rewards because in their own clans their high-skill means nothing: it's all-or-nothing, a step-function reward curve.

    Matchmaking based on individual ratings would make the return-on-skill curve more continuous, smoothen the win rate distribution across clans, consequently increase CW parity, and make individual CW matches less lopsided & more enjoyable. Some players join slots daily just to mostly lose or mostly win, because their clan's rating is far from their own skill level and they can't keep up with their opponents- where's the fun in that? FCC, a clan which declined sharply in skill, has also had its CW participation drop sharply because most of us just join games to get destroyed by opponents based on the clan's old rating.

    Clan Wars is meant to be an exciting competition for players regardless of their skill. The current discontinuity in clan win rates & return on skill, creating a few contender clans each season which are guaranteed to win if they can sustain high participation (while everyone else fights for lower spots because it takes a lot of effort to jump the chasm from 50% win rate to 60%+ when you can't climb incrementally, thanks to how CW rating-based-matchmaking works). This goes against the guiding principle of CW being fun for everyone, especially casual players who should be facing their peers instead of their much better clanmates'.

    Please, please, please use individual ratings for matchmaking so the competition become more fun for more people.

    This proposal would make Clan Wars matches more enjoyable, Clan Wars more inclusive, and clans more robust.

    Clan Wars' performance is simply (# of matches played) * (win rate). This means an elevated win rate (>50%) has the same effect as a (win rate/50%) participation boost: a 30-member clan with a 75% win rate is as good as a 45-member 50% win rate clan.

    The problem Clan Wars' CW rating matchmaking causes here stems from a single rating not capturing a clan's skill well. Clans vary in skill: players significantly better or worse than their median clanmate get lopsided matches.… more

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

14. Extension to overridden bonuses

    Overridden bonuses are good, causing chaos on big maps like the US map, but the limit could be extended to 10-50k, because it can give even more chaos to what happens in the game. (Yes, I have a template for extreme overriden bonuses for the US lol)

    This would help for chaotic and fun games with this extension, and I think diplomacy games would work with this too. The only downside is that lag wouldn't be minimal, and there would probably be a lot of it. Other than though, putting a warning before putting overriden bonuses would be good.

    So yeah, that's my idea!

    Overridden bonuses are good, causing chaos on big maps like the US map, but the limit could be extended to 10-50k, because it can give even more chaos to what happens in the game. (Yes, I have a template for extreme overriden bonuses for the US lol)

    This would help for chaotic and fun games with this extension, and I think diplomacy games would work with this too. The only downside is that lag wouldn't be minimal, and there would probably be a lot of it. Other than though, putting a warning before putting overriden bonuses would be good.

    So… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

15. Clan Wars Overhaul

    Full suggestion: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TxMqb7yxY8GPp2fP8B1T2su1is1JkGsGU08Mi-7yIdY/edit?usp=sharing

    Bundle of changes to improve activity in Clan Wars and make it more interesting for the strategic community. Changes are designed to work together (for example allowing players to join multiple slots every day without ELO-based ranking doesn't work well).

    Notable changes:
    -> players can join multiple slots every day
    -> no CW cap and clanless players can join CW
    -> improved matchmaking and template choice
    -> personal ELO system
    -> coin rewards and clan ranking based on personal ELO of active clanmates
    -> idle rewards based on activity and # of wins

    8 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

16. Change the 1v1 Ladder starting rating to some value other than 0 (900-1300 would be great).

    Much of the problems that get blamed on Bayeselo are in fact simply because the initial rating on the 1v1 Ladder is 0. 0, unfortunately, does not mean "no rating." It means you start from the bottom and set off a vicious garbage-in-garbage-out cycle of volatile, exploitable, slow-to-converge Bayeselo ratings, because Bayeselo is conservative and will keep matching you at the bottom. This probably also depresses ladder participation, since players tend to leave at a very high rate when they win 4/5 of their first 5 games.

    Note that:
    - Bayeselo is relative so 0 isn't any more special a value than 100 or -300. On the 1v1 ladder, it just means "1500 points worse than the average player."
    - Every single new ladder player is significantly better than a 0 rating would imply. Players on a long boot streak hit 600-700. (In practice, an initial rating of 0 implies "worst player on the ladder" as the null hypothesis, hence the vicious cycle)
    - By my math the actual skill level at the ~25% percentile for new (first-time) ladder entrants is somewhere between 900 and 1300. You could also do 1500 because...
    - ... starting at the center (or close to it) on the rating distribution will help Bayeselo converge faster, so this won't just mean newbies start on boot streaks (especially since Bayeselo has an uncertainty parameter). Think binary search.

    for more details: https://www.warzone.com/Forum/641242?Offset=0

    Much of the problems that get blamed on Bayeselo are in fact simply because the initial rating on the 1v1 Ladder is 0. 0, unfortunately, does not mean "no rating." It means you start from the bottom and set off a vicious garbage-in-garbage-out cycle of volatile, exploitable, slow-to-converge Bayeselo ratings, because Bayeselo is conservative and will keep matching you at the bottom. This probably also depresses ladder participation, since players tend to leave at a very high rate when they win 4/5 of their first 5 games.

    Note that:
    - Bayeselo is relative so 0 isn't any more special a… more

    7 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

17. Option (maybe even on by default) to disable all sounds except "new round"

    I love Warzone and I think it's a great game overall except the sounds.
    On the other hand one sound is very useful - the one telling me that it's my turn. I'd love to be able to turn all other off without the need of external browser plugins.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

18. ui stuff

    I would like the following to be optional:
    camera zooming in and out (when watching orders or clicking orders)
    camera moving (when watching orders or clicking orders)
    deploying last army moving from deployment phase to attack/transfer phase

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

19. Is there any way to get back into a game that you were part of on a local profile after you sign into your accout?

    I was playing a game with some freinds on the app and wasn't logged into my actual account. I then proceeded to log in and the game I was playing disappeared from my games list. I tried logging back out to access the game but that did not make it appear.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

20. List Quick Match Templates on Start Page

    When going for Quick Match...the active templates are hidden. I woul like to see the active templates. Please show them on the start page. This is information under the button: https://www.warzone.com/MultiPlayer?Quickmatch=1# shows the templates.

    Please list this info on the start page. Thank you!

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close