308 results found

1. Peace status to solve AI attacks.

   I wonder if it would be possible to add a peace status function to the game mainly to solve the problem with players turning AI which then starts to attack players they had a negotiated peace with. I noticed another suggestion about peace treaties but this isn't quite the same.

   We all know how much it affects games when somebody turns AI and the AI then begins attacking all over, especially on bigger maps, diplo or ffa doesn't matter. Then a player might come back and borders have to be restored, your diplomatic relations might be affected and so on. I'm thinking being able to set other players to peace status could solve that.

   What that would mean is if you set somebody to peace status and later orders an attack on that player you can still do it but you'd get a pop up, one for each player you're about to break the peace with, saying something like: "Are you sure you want to order an attack on "name" whome you have peace status with? This will remove your peace status with "name". Yes or no." That could avoid attacks made by mistake. If only the other player have set peace status with you you'd get a similar pop up saying for example ""name" have set peace status with you. Are you sure you want to order an attack? Yes or no". No would simply cancel your order.

   If somebody turns AI this new AI wouldn't attack a player with peace status, perhaps not even deploy armies in that direction but that might be asking for too much though :). But at least we could get an AI that would recognize peace status between players and act like a diplo card has been played vs players with peace status on. No more AI's breaking peaces you've agreed upon in chat.

   Another problem with the current system is that it can be abused as an ugly tactic when somebody intentionally turns AI and later takes back control to cause chaos or gain advantages. Peace status can solve that too.

   What problems could this addition have?

   The AI would still treat all other players as enemies as usual and if you would finish the game alone with a friendly AI I suppose it either gives up if you have the rule AI players surrender when only one human remains set or you get another pop up explaining "You are the only active human player. All active peace statuses are now turned off." Then all the AI controlled players will treat you and each other as enemies again so the games can be finished.

   Abuse? It won't completely solve the current problem with using turning AI as a tactic to cause chaos or gain advantages if players skip/forget setting peace status or removes it just before they want to let the AI do damage. But if you don't do it it can be considered intended since if peace status had been set it wouldn't have happened. However it is completely solved if all it takes is that the other player/players set peace status with you and your AI can recognize that. Then it would only be a problem if neither player have set peace status with the new AI and then you can only blaim yourself for not setting peace status on before somebody turned AI. You can not set peace status with an AI but you can end a peace status with an AI with an attack.

   I don't want this to be a peace status function where two players both have to set peace for it to be active. This is simply to help yourself not accidently attacking a friend or not causing trouble if you turn AI. You must of course still be able to attack anybody with peace status on if you want to make a backstab or if you have agreed with another player that peace is over. All you have to do is ordering an attack instead of manually cancelling the peace status somewhere.

   I don't think it would be a very complicated addition. I find it an easy solution to random AI attacks or AI abuse and it isn't hard to understand or learn. I've discussed this suggestion with some other experienced players who all liked the idea.

   I wonder if it would be possible to add a peace status function to the game mainly to solve the problem with players turning AI which then starts to attack players they had a negotiated peace with. I noticed another suggestion about peace treaties but this isn't quite the same.

   We all know how much it affects games when somebody turns AI and the AI then begins attacking all over, especially on bigger maps, diplo or ffa doesn't matter. Then a player might come back and borders have to be restored, your diplomatic relations might be affected and so on.… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminDanWL (Admin, WarLight) responded

   Completed as a mod "AIs don't attack"

2. Display Match Rating in CW Games

   Please display the Clan War Rating in the Game Settings Tab, and also the Change in CWR for that game in the Game Summary tab.

   This would be similar to QuickMatch. The inclusion of this information will give important information to the game's participants, and improve game play. See additional information in this Forum: https://www.warzone.com/Forum/669995-display-clan-war-match-rating-game-settings

   14 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminFizzer (WarLight Creator, WarLight) responded

   Each clan's war rating is now displayed in the game description!

3. Receive base number of card pieces regardless of attack success

   The current rules state: In order to qualify for receiving cards in a turn, players must capture at least one enemy or neutral territory. It does not matter how many they capture beyond the first - they just need to capture one or more. Players that don't capture any territories or only capture teammate territories do not receive any card pieces that turn.

   When you successfully attack and capture an enemy or neutral territory, at the end of that turn you will receive a piece of a card, regardless of whether you lose the territory later that turn. You can't get more, no matter how many territories you take.

   I reccomend that other options should be available, such as: successful capture only, and base income per turn.

   I want to do this for a duel, with full fog, commerce on, and only 2 territories, so that we can use number of turns to strategically choose between two of four or five cards that have different chances of having a piece received but useful for a duel.

   Such as a one turn recon card that is relatively easier to get than saving up a number of turns for a much more expensive or less likely to be received pieces for spy card that lasts 3 turns. Or a cheap reinforcements card vs an expensive sanctions card.

   The issue is, because of the "must successfully capture" rule, you can not gain pieces passively like armies, or gold, and so it is useless on a map with only one territory per player. But even in general, this would be a fresh twist up on settings that allow for new game types.

   The current rules state: In order to qualify for receiving cards in a turn, players must capture at least one enemy or neutral territory. It does not matter how many they capture beyond the first - they just need to capture one or more. Players that don't capture any territories or only capture teammate territories do not receive any card pieces that turn.

   When you successfully attack and capture an enemy or neutral territory, at the end of that turn you will receive a piece of a card, regardless of whether you lose the territory later that turn. You can't… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminDanWL (Admin, WarLight) responded

   Implemented in mods Advanced Card Distribution (CS+) and Advanced Card Distribution (per player)

4. Visible Unconquered Territories - a misnomer

   Hey Fizzer,
   In WZI under the artifacts tab showing the statistics, I find the line “Visible unconquered territories” to be a bit misleading. Clearly it only counts the unfogged territories (typically the ones adjacent to what you have already conquered, or, fog-busted territories) and not “visible” territories (like all the ones you can see via visibility upgrades from caches, recipes, markets, etc).
   Why tell people the number of "visible territories" when you don’t count the "visible territories"?
   I proposed a couple things, either change the name to “Unfogged unconqured territories” or even better, have two lines, one for unfogged, and one for visible!
   Your grammar nazi,
   Gunk

   Hey Fizzer,
   In WZI under the artifacts tab showing the statistics, I find the line “Visible unconquered territories” to be a bit misleading. Clearly it only counts the unfogged territories (typically the ones adjacent to what you have already conquered, or, fog-busted territories) and not “visible” territories (like all the ones you can see via visibility upgrades from caches, recipes, markets, etc).
   Why tell people the number of "visible territories" when you don’t count the "visible territories"?
   I proposed a couple things, either change the name to “Unfogged unconqured territories” or even better, have two lines, one for unfogged, and… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminFizzer (WarLight Creator, WarLight) responded

   I agree, this is now fixed in the latest version of the game, 5.20.0.  Thank you for reporting it!

5. tournament shortcut

   When playing a tournament game, there should be a menu option to go to the tournament overview page to see how it is progressing. I have been in several tournaments with similar names as they are based on generic templates and it is hard to see which tournament a current game is part of.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminDanWL (Admin, WarLight) responded

   This feature already exists. From a game, go to Game > Settings > Full Settings the. Click on Part of tournament.

6. Alliance Card / Game mode

   A game mode option or card that allows players to actually form teams/alliances in game in which they would have to break the alliance in order to attack that player again. After breaking the alliance they would have to wait X number of turns (can be customized in the options). When in an alliance they will have the team chat option and will be able to transfer armies and things just like a normal team game.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminDanWL (Admin, WarLight) responded

   The Diplomacy Card already exits and there are several diplomacy mods

7. Clan PM system

   so basically when u want urgent news to be spread to all your clan members u can just click messages and send clan message and type ur notice. then all the members in the clan will receive this message.

   this could be limited to once a day or such to prevent spamming

   (its used in other games with clan systems to great effect)

   15 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   3 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminFizzer (WarLight Creator, WarLight) responded

   You can now distribute urgent news to your clan members via the clan chat room! Thanks for the suggestion

8. Add ability to filter out tournaments you have lost

   There are many tournaments I have joined where I lose in the second or third round but then they keep going for weeks after I lose because other people are still playing. I would love if there was a way to filter out tournaments that I have lost while looking at the tournaments tab

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminFizzer (WarLight Creator, WarLight) responded

   Warzone now shows you tournaments you’re active in! Thanks for the suggestion

9. One Way Connections

   I think it would be cool of there were one way territory connections, then you could make having the higher ground useful, or you could have it so that castle towers can attack the outside, but in order to get in you have to go through the gates.

   0 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminDanWL (Admin, WarLight) responded

   Completed as mod "One Way Connections"

10. So, I think it would be cool if instead of only getting cards when you take a territory, you should get cards no matter what.
    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminDanWL (Admin, WarLight) responded

    Completed as mod Advanced Card Distribution (per player)

11. mute/sound volume button

    would love to be able to jam to music and play warzone.....volume adjust or mute would help.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminDanWL (Admin, WarLight) responded

    If on browser: while in a game, go to your name (in the top right) > App Settings > then locate the Sounds, Critical Sounds and Music levels.

    If on app: same as browser but profile icon in top right > Settings.

12. On mobile version we can't "ping" territories
    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminDanWL (Admin, WarLight) responded

    This feature has since been added to the apps

13. team of humans against a team of bots

    It is possible to play a team of humans against a team of bots?
    It doesn't seem the case, can we have that, to practice certain maps

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminDanWL (Admin, WarLight) responded

    Is all ready possible

14. Clan System Reformation and to Provide more Functions/Options

    Greetings WarLight!

    I would like to suggest a combined Ideas of all the Clan related issues and functionality as 'MEGA IDEA' where all the ideas combined under one Idea as it will be neat and clear to all and organized.

    We shall begin:-

    1: {Clan Recruitment Functionality/Option}

    A: A Clan Leader or Appointed trusted Clan officer of an Clan can 'Invite' Any NON-Clan Members to the clanby proving them a function to right click A players name and an option given 'INVITE to Clan' given.

    B: Non-Clan Players can 'Join' at will any clan that is set to Open recruitment setting any can freely join a Clan And/Or according to Prerequisites accordingly who can join (example; A clan set the recruitment requirements to a player must be lvl 10 or lvl 25 to join the clan or must have such and such 'boot rate %' set to this limit or so.

    C: Non-Clan Players can 'Request to Join' the clan if the CLAN set the recruitment setting to 'Request to Join' option within the clan setting set by Clan Leader or Clan Officer.

    D: To provide the function for Clan within the function to set there clan recruitment setting set from [JOIN], [REQUEST TO JOIN] for the players available to click such button near the Clan name or to click on Clan tab/Page.

    E: Clan Invites to a Non-Clan Player is not required to meet the prerequisites as they get the privilege either to accept or decline invites from Clan Leader or Clan Officer invite.

    2: {Clan Management}

    A: Clan Management as we all know it starts with the 'Clan Founder' and goes down to certain appointed players to certain rank such as Clan Officers.

    B: Clan hierarchy shall be like this ;

    (i) Clan Founder as the founder and creator of the clan which is the Position,

    (ii) Clan Leader is well known as the leader of everything within Clan AKA 'BOSS' which is given all the privilege of the clan functionality as the BOSS may do so what ever within his Full Authority Given as the role LEADER.

    (iii) Clan Officer, Clan Manager, are bellow the rank of Leader AKA 'BOSS' and they shall be given some privileges to the clan functionality.

    (iv): Clan Sergeant or Captain AKA veteran proved the role as only minimal Clan Functionality as to only recruit/invite players into the clan and has earned as the veteran rank within the hierarchy of Clan Management.

    3: {Clan Titles are not as same as Clan Management Roles but do have somewhat worthiness of it to earn and acquire them}

    A: Do not net Confused with Clan Titles and Clan Role in Clan management. since Clan Titles are available. Clan Management Roles are only to be Appointed by the creator/founder of clan or given the automatic role provided as second member in the clan as second in command or Clan manager or Officer.

    3: {Clan League to be available as function to all players when in WarLight under the tab of community and also provide the function under the tab community 'My Clan' as whenever a player or member wishes to quickly open clan page, the player simply needs to click on community tab a list falls down and bellow an option available 'My Clan'.}

    4: {Provide the function button (Chat room) directly ready to click next to coins....since it is only available when u click the game ...but I would like to suggest to have that function in all web modes and when ever a player/user opens WarLight this function is available instead of clicking on a game within a game.}

    4: {Clan Members List to be sorted the functions provided to players as they see fit to sort for themselves visible only and according such as A-Z or 1-Z or according to how active they are or how much win rate% and boot rate%. This function is provided for Clan Members and Non-Clan members.}

    Greetings WarLight!

    I would like to suggest a combined Ideas of all the Clan related issues and functionality as 'MEGA IDEA' where all the ideas combined under one Idea as it will be neat and clear to all and organized.

    We shall begin:-

    1: {Clan Recruitment Functionality/Option}

    A: A Clan Leader or Appointed trusted Clan officer of an Clan can 'Invite' Any NON-Clan Members to the clanby proving them a function to right click A players name and an option given 'INVITE to Clan' given.

    B: Non-Clan Players can 'Join' at will any clan that is set to Open recruitment… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminFizzer (WarLight Creator, WarLight) responded

    Open clans are now possible, and anyone can join an open clan! Thanks for the suggestion

15. The ability to make transfers to "enemies" in games

    In the base game, transferring isn't allowed. Only attacking. The game doesn't recognize allies from enemies. I suggest the utility of transferring units to "enemies" into the base game. Please and thank you!

    5 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminDanWL (Admin, WarLight) responded

    Several diplomacy mods have this as a feature

16. Semi-automatic distribution mode

    ( Initially suggested in:
    https://www.warzone.com/Forum/382505-feature-suggestion-semiautomatic-distribution )

    Motivation:
    Semi-automatic distribution would maintain some attributes of auto-distribution, like creating more varied games and forcing players to adapt to sub-optimal starts, but at the same time allow them to have some control over their starts and give the ability to avoid truly terrible combinations, to some extent.

    Feature description:
    
    1) for every player, the game randomly offers N candidate picks (configured in settings)
    2) out of these N picks, the player selects M actual starts; if the player doesn't select enough, the game has to randomly pick the missing amount (same as insufficient picks in manual distribution), but still only out of the candidate picks
    3) game begins, each player starting with their M picks

    Notes:
    1) N >= M (if N = M, this basically becomes auto-distribution where the players can just preview their starts - doesn't make too much sense), this inequality should be enforced by the settings
    2) I would suggest candidate picks shouldn't overlap between players, everyone gets a disjoint set of N candidate picks - would prevent problems with determining priorities and be generally cleaner in my opinion
    3) the selection of candidate picks could also be inherited from existing distribution modes, e.g. "Give me 4 candidates out of 'Random warlords/Random cities/Full distribution'" (whatever the map supports). In most use-cases however, just selecting candidates out of all possible (full distribution) should be good enough I'd say.

    ( Initially suggested in:
    https://www.warzone.com/Forum/382505-feature-suggestion-semiautomatic-distribution )

    Motivation:
    Semi-automatic distribution would maintain some attributes of auto-distribution, like creating more varied games and forcing players to adapt to sub-optimal starts, but at the same time allow them to have some control over their starts and give the ability to avoid truly terrible combinations, to some extent.

    Feature description:
    
    1) for every player, the game randomly offers N candidate picks (configured in settings)
    2) out of these N picks, the player selects M actual starts; if the player doesn't select enough, the game has to randomly pick the missing amount (same as insufficient… more

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminDanWL (Admin, WarLight) responded

    Exists as mods Hybrid Distribution and Hybrid Distribution 2

17. Random slots

    In games with custom scenarios, it would be nice to not know which one you get. If you would get a random custom scenario slot, it could make games much more interesting and more people would join games

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminDanWL (Admin, WarLight) responded

    Added in update 5.24.0.

18. 200-player full-maps

    Since there are approximately 200 nations, there should be a full map, 200-player feature. In community chat, I was told the only real problem is color-coding each nation but there are real solutions to the conundrum rather than ignoring it.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminDanWL (Admin, WarLight) responded

    The maximum players per game has since been increased to 400 (more than 40 requires the Mega Games feature)

19. Have the ability to save invitations in a game template.
    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminDanWL (Admin, WarLight) responded

    Players/open seats are already saved into the template. You may need to edit it, change the players the save the template again.

20. 2 checkboxes at QM templates

    When I am playing QM I want to play some of the templates as RT (smaller maps) and some as MD matches (bigger maps). So it would be nice if you have 2 checkboxes in front (or behind) every template in the list - one for RT QM and one for MD QM.

    35 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminDanWL (Admin, WarLight) responded

    Completed with update 5.15.0.