Overhall of Clan System
Make clans more fun!
- Allow name changes.
- Have clan levels. Based on the same things as normal levels, but maybe times them by ten or something? Make it one coin for level one, 1+2 coins to level two (and so on) for the founder, and some other kind of reward for the average member.
- Allow splits of manager rights:
FOUNDER LEVEL
For the founder only, cannot be booted. Can do everything that current people can do, and cannot be booted ever, by anyone.
STANDARD LEVEL
Same as current manager rights.
RECRUITMENT LEVEL
Can only recruit and change tags.
Vote for me please!!!
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/a521b4bed80da725f465fa4944f7f0ab?size=40&default=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.uvcdn.com%2Fpkg%2Fadmin%2Ficons%2Fuser_70-6bcf9e08938533adb9bac95c3e487cb2a6d4a32f890ca6fdc82e3072e0ea0368.png)
Hello!
Warzone just launched the Features Request Forum, which is replacing the old UserVoice forum! This offers a lot of improvements over UserVoice, such as the ability to see who is voting for each item and expiring votes from inactive players.
If you still care about this UserVoice item, please put your votes into it on the new Feature Request Forum at https://www.warzone.com/Forum/f12-Feature-Requests
-
Tabby commented
I agree this should be done. For example I will add Azul and others to standard level and almost everyone to recruitment level.
A more important change will be allowing one account to be in multiple clans.
-
anonymous commented
A lot of clans have had the founder retire or kicked, (Michael for example started Vitrix and The Lost Wolves, but is not allowed in either) .
-
SergeiVladmirkov commented
The problem with this, is the incorporation of two distinctly separate ideas into a single suggestion.
Some people might agree with the idea of having 'manager levels' of managing rights, however they might disagree with having 'clan levels', as it might discriminate against some of the more important, yet exclusive clans who might be underrated. Darklordio already proved that theory. -
TheFalconGuy commented
My only problem with this is the implementation.
It would take a long time to implement and a lot of code. -
anonymous commented
Not sure about the coins but I fully support the rest
-
Thomas 633 commented
1. Is because some people have terrible names for their clans. At least a one-time name change.
2. Is to entice people not to create those inactive one person clans.
3. Is so you don't have to go trawling through your list of friends every single time someone wants an invite at three am. -
Ayan Ayan commented
number 3 is ok for me, but other stuff... bullshit. Sorry, no vote
-
bob commented
i run a clan myself i love the idea it can help when someone only wants to recruit people i give this 3 votes good luck guys
-
anonymous commented
1 - Isn't the point with clans to be recogniced?
2 - So the new meaning with clans will be to recruit as many as you can, to earn money?..
3 - Whats the point with that?1-3 - Will these things "make clans more fun" ?
No vote here:)
-
John Smith commented
Good idea, maybe change the recruitment level a bit, not sure how though