Skip to content

Master Ree

My feedback

3 results found

  1. 468 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Teammates leaving a game is certainly frustrating. Allowing another teammate to enter orders for them is definitely a possible way to address that problem.

    We could use some feedback on the following potential issues with this feature:

    1. In teams of more than 2 players, who gets control of a player that’s left? Just first to click the button, or assign a team captain or something?
    2. Could this slow down real time games? Imagine if one person has to enter orders for 3 teammates that have left plus themselves.
    3. Would this encourage someone to boot their teammates, just to take control over them?
    4. It needs to be very clear who is playing who for every turn. If someone that’s under control starts sabotaging their team, like gifting stuff to an enemy or attacking teammates, it needs to be clear it isn’t really them and you shouldn’t necessarily…

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Master Ree commented  · 

    There has been a lot of talk below of which I've taken suggestions but here's what I think as well:

    1. As stated before, it's volition and unanimous decision by the remaining teammates.

    2. Wouldn't slow down team games, since the above, it would only be taken by a player who a) has the time and b) wants to do it KNOWING the extra time it will take

    3. Not sure if it's possibly but can you not set it to "if booted by teammate, not being able to take over?". This would eliminate skilled players from booting unskilled players just to take over. It would not fix belittling someone to quit in team chat and then waiting for an opponent to boot them but nothing's perfect.

    4. Similar to how the AI is set up, you could go "Master Ree: was Fizzer" happens again, "General Koster: was Master Ree: was Fizzer" and so on. Not the most clear but it puts the person in control first.

    5. While if everyone was booted and one person controls the team would diminish the value, qualitatively (and quantitatively) speaking, ending a game on one or multiple boots diminishes a team game more in my opinion.

    6. This goes back to (1), it's a choice, there is no requirement. Only people who would bot get burnt out would take over and again, in my opinion having this option would make people more likely to join team games since now they will not automatically lose because someone ahs a bad connection or the power goes out.

  2. 34 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Master Ree supported this idea  · 
  3. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

Feedback and Knowledge Base