Skip to content

Kain

My feedback

5 results found

  1. 42 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Kain supported this idea  · 
  2. 21 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Kain supported this idea  · 
  3. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Kain supported this idea  · 
  4. 468 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Teammates leaving a game is certainly frustrating. Allowing another teammate to enter orders for them is definitely a possible way to address that problem.

    We could use some feedback on the following potential issues with this feature:

    1. In teams of more than 2 players, who gets control of a player that’s left? Just first to click the button, or assign a team captain or something?
    2. Could this slow down real time games? Imagine if one person has to enter orders for 3 teammates that have left plus themselves.
    3. Would this encourage someone to boot their teammates, just to take control over them?
    4. It needs to be very clear who is playing who for every turn. If someone that’s under control starts sabotaging their team, like gifting stuff to an enemy or attacking teammates, it needs to be clear it isn’t really them and you shouldn’t necessarily…

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kain commented  · 

    1) as proposed by @Jurden Seag -taking control over booted teammate should be volitional. Although I dont think it sould be voted - this would cause too much mess. I'drather propose that just every teammate can take over this control if he was "first to click". Of course teammates should discuss between them, which of them wil take this controll (if they cant it is their problem). Also this takover should be irreversible once "clicked". This also rais additional issue - 7 - when player takes control over the army of his teammate, and later his original army is eliminated, he should be still able to play his teammates army.

    2) It could therefore it should be volitionall

    3) certainly yes :)

    4) defiantely it should be visibly stated who is controlled and by who

    5) I think this option would only do good for teamgames that are too often ruined by having a teammate booted. After assigning this option more people will be encouraged to play teamgames since having teammate booted wont result in highly proplable defeat.

    6) IF this option is volitional, this shouldnt happen as player will allway have opportunity to decide wheather he wants to spenn additionall time to play moves for his booted teammate.

  5. 54 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Kain supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base