krinid
My feedback
5 results found
-
39 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
162 voteskrinid
supported this idea
·
-
4 voteskrinid
supported this idea
·
-
5 voteskrinid
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment krinid
commented
Good idea, I like it. Just came across this as I asked for something similar.
Totally agree. Imho, this is the only case where that feature even makes sense, making sure your teammates are on board with the surrender directive.
To your point, who cares if your opponent(s) do or don't want you to surrender? Just prolongs a game that's already over. Doesn't make sense in 1v1 or team games.
And in FFAs, it's even worse, b/c there's always 1 idiot who either hasn't noticed or doesn't care, and it takes a long time to surrender.
I've played in 1 FFA where there was 1 idiot who intentional didn't accept surrenders until he bordered the person. He wanted everyone to stay in the game and fight each other, until they were a threat to him, then he would accept. So of course we all banded together to kill him, lol.
The feature causes more issues than whatever problem it was meant to solve. Once someone has checked out of a game, it's hard to reel them back in simply b/c you don't accept their surrender.
In a team game, at least there's a legit reason, to discuss tactics/possibilities, and give time to reconsider surrendering.