57 results found

1. New cards (used for combat/airlift) + showing a troop

   I think that there should be a card that you´re able to airlift to friends, exmple diplomacy you have an ally in war then you airlift to their fronts, this can only be good,I mean it can´t destroy anything and if you don´t like it you don´t need to have it on.
   there should be a card that is really rare that can airlift troops to enemys and take one territory (with a warning in chat) and then you can fight people that are a few territories away.
   There should also show up one or two troops at evry territory controlled just for nice design.

   I think that there should be a card that you´re able to airlift to friends, exmple diplomacy you have an ally in war then you airlift to their fronts, this can only be good,I mean it can´t destroy anything and if you don´t like it you don´t need to have it on.
   there should be a card that is really rare that can airlift troops to enemys and take one territory (with a warning in chat) and then you can fight people that are a few territories away.
   There should also show up one or two troops at evry territory… more

   3 votes

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminDanWL (Admin, WarLight) responded

   Completed in mod "Gift armies"

2. Summary of card pieces in settings menu

   There is a great many cards in WL, each with a lot of settings. With each card divided into a different number of pieces, of which you get a fixed minimum number per turn and then there's a number of random pieces... distributed by configurable weights... It becomes rather complicated; even experienced players might not be able to see, at a glance, how all the card settings will combine.

   How about adding an "executive summary" (both in the create-game screen and on the settings page, which people /should/ check before joining the game), like so:

   ---

   Current version (in Game Settings menu):

   Reinforcements Card: In 3 pieces for 10 armies (minimum 1 piece per turn, weight is 2)
   Airlift Card: In 6 pieces
   Diplomacy: In 7 pieces to last for 2 turns (minimum 1 piece per turn)

   Number of card pieces per turn: 7

   ---

   Suggested version (for Game Settings menu; something similar for the Create Game menu):

   Reinforcements Card: In 3 pieces for 10 armies (minimum 1 piece per turn, weight is 2)
   Airlift Card: In 6 pieces
   Diplomacy: In 7 pieces to last for 2 turns (minimum 1 piece per turn)

   Number of card pieces per turn: 7

   Average number of pieces per turn (per player / per team):
   Reinforcements Card: 3.5 pieces / 10.5 pieces
   Airlift Card: 1.25 pieces / 3.75 pieces

   Diplomacy: 2.25 pieces / 6.75 pieces

   Notes and caveats:
   These numbers are for a team of three players, in practice this would of course depend on the team size. (I'm not sure how to deal with games having unbalanced team sizes... the easy way out would be to only display the per-player number.) This tacitly assumes all players conquer a territory each turn; the wording could benefit from some fine-tuning.

   Source of this idea (including more detailed description):
   https://www.warlight.net/Forum/93805-discussion-permadiplo

   There is a great many cards in WL, each with a lot of settings. With each card divided into a different number of pieces, of which you get a fixed minimum number per turn and then there's a number of random pieces... distributed by configurable weights... It becomes rather complicated; even experienced players might not be able to see, at a glance, how all the card settings will combine.

   How about adding an "executive summary" (both in the create-game screen and on the settings page, which people /should/ check before joining the game), like so:

   ---

   Current version (in Game Settings

   … more
   1 vote

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminDanWL (Admin, WarLight) responded

   There are now icons that summarise game settings, including cards. There is also a summery of the settings in game menu settings in the new Unity client.

3. Differentiate between 'No orders received' and 'Orders committed'

   I have been playing Warlight for almost two weeks now. I like the game, but, being a Diplomacy online player, one particular feature strikes me as very destructive in games and that is the commit system and resulting boots when not committed in time, which ruin games.

   A lot of the games I played have been hindered by (auto-)boots, because players have not committed orders. I myself have been kicked out of two games too, where I had my orders in place, but was just waiting for a response from a fellow player and hence I did not commit in time.

   It is not very easy to see which game needs your attention most if you play a lot of multi-day games, since instead of showing the time to the deadline (which would be useful) it shows you how long the current turn has been on. Furthermore, the order is semi-random. But, instead of changing this (which would be good in addition) I suggest you implement the following instead, which they use in most Diplomacy games:
   - Players can issue orders.
   - Players can finalize issued orders (on Warlight 'commit') signaling they are done thinking about them and are OK with processing.
   (The two are a different thing!)

   Now, the game would just proceed to the deadline and then process all issued orders. Only if a player did not issue anything ('no orders received'), a boot is in order. If a player did not finalize/commit, the game just processes his orders as they were.

   This prevents the weird boots when players were obviously playing but just did not want to commit, because they did not want to turn to be processed ahead of the deadline. In many of Warlight's online games, diplomacy or negotiations play a big part. Many players do not want to commit, because they are still awaiting a response. They would however have orders ready for if that response does not come before the deadline. Right now, you would have to get on at exactly the deadline to click commit, instead of just being able to have the orders processed as they were.
   It also prevents games from switching deadline times constantly because there is no option to just process at the deadline and not earlier (when all players are committed). This is a real hindrance for some people. You cannot prepare your schedule, because at any time, the timeschedule can change.

   Please, change this. If you need more info, just ask.

   I have been playing Warlight for almost two weeks now. I like the game, but, being a Diplomacy online player, one particular feature strikes me as very destructive in games and that is the commit system and resulting boots when not committed in time, which ruin games.

   A lot of the games I played have been hindered by (auto-)boots, because players have not committed orders. I myself have been kicked out of two games too, where I had my orders in place, but was just waiting for a response from a fellow player and hence I did not commit in… more

   4 votes

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminFizzer (WarLight Creator, WarLight) responded

   Warzone now auto-commits your orders in place of a boot! See https://www.warzone.com/blog/index.php/2019/02/update-4-13-speeding-up-real-time-games/

4. Clickable links in game and mod descriptions

   Some players find that the game description does not contain enough space for them to go through their diplomacy game rules for example. So they paste a url into game description instead. The links aren’t currently clickable and on app/standalone the text isn’t copyable.

   Some players are unsure how to use certain mods. Would be better to share a link to a collaborative website which covers things that are not in the mod description.

   1 vote

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

5. Aid Card

   An "Aid Card" could function identically to a "reverse" Sanctions Card, in that it multiplies income rather than divides it.

   The reason for having it as a separate card however, would be so that one can have both sanctions and "reverse sanctions" in the same game. Additionally, it could be given unique functionality in that one can only use it on others. (Being able to use it on oneself could also be toggle-able like so many other features).

   I think a card like this would have enormous appeal in 'Diplomacy' games, where a player might want to help an ally without directly involving themselves in combat. Particularly if other players' card use is kept secret.

   A "duplicate" card type like this should be relatively easy to implement, and there's certainly precedent for it.

   An "Aid Card" could function identically to a "reverse" Sanctions Card, in that it multiplies income rather than divides it.

   The reason for having it as a separate card however, would be so that one can have both sanctions and "reverse sanctions" in the same game. Additionally, it could be given unique functionality in that one can only use it on others. (Being able to use it on oneself could also be toggle-able like so many other features).

   I think a card like this would have enormous appeal in 'Diplomacy' games, where a player might want to help… more

   5 votes

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   declined  ·  AdminDanWL (Admin, WarLight) responded

   There’s no point to have a new card that adds armies when a negative sanctions card could be used.

6. Pop-up box asking if you are active before game start

   I have played a lot of diplomacy games in my Warlight career and so many times after waiting hours for the game to fill up, one player ends up getting booted and creates a power vacuum.

   My suggestion is that just before the game starts a pop-up box displays asking if you are ready to start the game. It basically works like a boot timer, which can be customized by the host.

   Say the game starts, the pop-up displays, but one person doesn't click 'ready' within the allotted time, then that player is basically kicked from the game before the game starts and his/her place is opened for a new, active, player to join.

   This will help save a lot of games from being ruined by inactive players, which is one of the biggest problems, and most reoccurring problem, I have experienced while playing Warlight.

   Thanks for reading ;)

   I have played a lot of diplomacy games in my Warlight career and so many times after waiting hours for the game to fill up, one player ends up getting booted and creates a power vacuum.

   My suggestion is that just before the game starts a pop-up box displays asking if you are ready to start the game. It basically works like a boot timer, which can be customized by the host.

   Say the game starts, the pop-up displays, but one person doesn't click 'ready' within the allotted time, then that player is basically kicked from the game before the… more

   6 votes

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

7. Allow a "Currently in x games" Lobby Filter

   Allow players to apply a filter on their created games (similar to bootrate or level filter), to filter out players who are in more games than their determined limit.

   This would be useful, because players who are in too many games concurrently, usually play really slow and oftentimes their play-quality suffers, since they're not as invested in the game as those who are in fewer games. So they often play carelessly and surrender easily and may also be less communicative if the game requires eg diplomacy.

   Some players, like me, find that annoying and prefer quality over quantity and thus would love to be able to set a filter like that, to ensure focused, invested and engaged players.

   Allow players to apply a filter on their created games (similar to bootrate or level filter), to filter out players who are in more games than their determined limit.

   This would be useful, because players who are in too many games concurrently, usually play really slow and oftentimes their play-quality suffers, since they're not as invested in the game as those who are in fewer games. So they often play carelessly and surrender easily and may also be less communicative if the game requires eg diplomacy.

   Some players, like me, find that annoying and prefer quality over quantity and… more

   3 votes

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

8. MORE DIFFERENT CARDS

   1. MORAL CARD : BOOST OR DECREASE THE ATTACK OR DEFENCE KILL RATE OF A SELECTED PLAYER

   2. (added feature) GIFT CARD : it should be possible to gift a whole bonus or all places you own within one bonus to another player

   3. (added feature) DIPLOMACY CARD : players should be enabled to play the DOPLOMACY CARD ON A PLAYER AND NEUTRAL ARMIES (so the selected player canonly attack another players territorries)

   4. (added feature) REINFORCEMENT CARD :

   a) BORDERALERT CARD : works like reinforcment card but increases your armis at each of your borders

   b) instead of getting the set amount of armies from the reinforcement card you can choose to get tripple that (or any other set percentage maybe even a range of percentage like from 0% to 300 %) of the armies you would get from normal usage but randomly distributed over you places

   now to the other features :

   TEAM SHUFFLE:

   it should be possible to choose a setting that in which you can determine a fix turn lke every 10 turns or in turn 15 in which the teams are randomly reassigned

   1. MORAL CARD : BOOST OR DECREASE THE ATTACK OR DEFENCE KILL RATE OF A SELECTED PLAYER

   2. (added feature) GIFT CARD : it should be possible to gift a whole bonus or all places you own within one bonus to another player

   3. (added feature) DIPLOMACY CARD : players should be enabled to play the DOPLOMACY CARD ON A PLAYER AND NEUTRAL ARMIES (so the selected player canonly attack another players territorries)

   4. (added feature) REINFORCEMENT CARD :

   a) BORDERALERT CARD : works like reinforcment card but increases your armis at each of your borders

   b) instead of getting the set amount of… more

   6 votes

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   2 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   declined  ·  AdminDanWL (Admin, WarLight) responded

   These can be implemented as mods. See https://www.warzone.com/wiki/Mods for details of how to create mods.

9. Allow 41 to 50 player games

   It's a known fact that there was once a 50-man FFA event held by Fizzer himself, so the code is there; implementing such a feature, even if under some nasty requisites (membership, or a high level like 57~60) would be very easy and quick. Assuming the code wasn't changed much, it's all about making it publicly avaiable.

   This would be great for large Free-For-All games; as chaotic as 40-man games are, an extra 20% players will make it even more fun! Specially on huge maps like Hex Earth.

   In addition, this would be specially good for diplomacy players who tend to run out of slots very often in games, as 40 usually isn't enough.

   Speaking of slots - there are 50 existing colors in the scenario maker, so no new additions are needed (except one so Smoky Black doesn't become avaiable for free).

   tl;dr: It's easy/quick to implement and a pretty fun feature to play around with.

   Prerequisites COULD be:
   Based on level - You can make 40-man games at level 53, so:
   L54 - 42 players
   L55 - 44 players
   L56 - 46 players
   L57 - 48 players
   L58 - 50 players

   Or, simply, by making it so members can add 10 more players to their games, therefore giving an extra feature to make your supporters happy after the huge disappointment that was 100 bucks for a color. This would also make Membership sell a lot faster.

   It's a known fact that there was once a 50-man FFA event held by Fizzer himself, so the code is there; implementing such a feature, even if under some nasty requisites (membership, or a high level like 57~60) would be very easy and quick. Assuming the code wasn't changed much, it's all about making it publicly avaiable.

   This would be great for large Free-For-All games; as chaotic as 40-man games are, an extra 20% players will make it even more fun! Specially on huge maps like Hex Earth.

   In addition, this would be specially good for diplomacy players who tend… more

   32 votes

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   declined  ·  AdminFizzer (WarLight Creator, WarLight) responded

   This idea already exists here: https://warlight.uservoice.com/forums/77051-warzone-features/suggestions/7099880-50-player-games-50-starting-colours

10. Army Caps for Individual Territories

    Adding the option for a gamemaker to set army caps for individual territories or groups of territories (i.e., all the territories in a specific bonus, or all cities on a map) would add a whole new layer of strategy to the game. This rule would allow for games that include siege mechanics (where cities have higher army caps than the territories around them), force players to spread their armies out, and and better utilization of bottleneck territories/defences. However, it would also keep power differentials in place, as those with a higher income would be able to replace troops faster and eventually batter down the defenses of the smaller players. But, with this rule, powerful players can't immediately storm through a smaller player's territory and hugely increase their own income in a short number of turns (which often happens and throws whole games out of balance). This would best be used for diplomacy games.

    Adding the option for a gamemaker to set army caps for individual territories or groups of territories (i.e., all the territories in a specific bonus, or all cities on a map) would add a whole new layer of strategy to the game. This rule would allow for games that include siege mechanics (where cities have higher army caps than the territories around them), force players to spread their armies out, and and better utilization of bottleneck territories/defences. However, it would also keep power differentials in place, as those with a higher income would be able to replace troops faster and… more

    6 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

11. Be able to remove players that have accepted the game

    I see that Fizzer has already declined this- but here is the reasoning. Say a host has created a game, and it takes forever to fill. Say somebody who joined the game when it was created is no longer active on warzone once the game starts, passing the prerequisite bootrate many times over. The player has basically been booted before the game had already begun. This is a problem for me, and is most relevant to custom scenario games (especially diplomacy), and team games, where either a power vacuum is formed, or a team has less players than another. So say prerequisite bootrate is 20%, shouldn't you be able to remove someone with 50%? Like make the player only able to be removed after the prerequisite has been passed; or even have boot/surrender settings contain an extra prerequisite that defines when a player may be removed from the lobby.

    I see that Fizzer has already declined this- but here is the reasoning. Say a host has created a game, and it takes forever to fill. Say somebody who joined the game when it was created is no longer active on warzone once the game starts, passing the prerequisite bootrate many times over. The player has basically been booted before the game had already begun. This is a problem for me, and is most relevant to custom scenario games (especially diplomacy), and team games, where either a power vacuum is formed, or a team has less players than another.… more

    4 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    declined  ·  AdminDanWL (Admin, WarLight) responded

    This idea has already been declined.

12. Capital setting

    You should add a capital setting as option map creators can choose. This setting can either apply to normal or diplomacy games.

    Possible features related (creators could choose some of them):

    1. Base income comes from the capital, if you lose it, your base income goes to zero.

    2. Losing your capital makes you lose the game.

    3. Change the location of your capital card

    4. Deployment limited to areas connected to your capital. That's probably the better feature this capital could provide, because:

    a) That's perfect to prevent attacks with a huge stacks in order to break ennemy bonuses regardless to the protection of your conquered land.
    b) It would also force players to defend their supply line, and encourage encirclement and front formation tactics (perhaps also improving the multi-attack setting)
    c) It could provide also another use for the airlift card in order to supply the encircled units
    d) For map creators, ports, airports, or any other long range connections in maps connected to far away lands could perfect serve this feature as supply bridges and thus become essential targets for bombs and other attacks.

    1. Non connected to the capital units may either get "crazy" and start beheaving like AI's or are unable to move for lack of command from it's generals.

    You should add a capital setting as option map creators can choose. This setting can either apply to normal or diplomacy games.

    Possible features related (creators could choose some of them):

    1. Base income comes from the capital, if you lose it, your base income goes to zero.

    2. Losing your capital makes you lose the game.

    3. Change the location of your capital card

    4. Deployment limited to areas connected to your capital. That's probably the better feature this capital could provide, because:

    a) That's perfect to prevent attacks with a huge stacks in order to break ennemy bonuses regardless to the protection… more

    12 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    declined  ·  AdminFizzer (WarLight Creator, WarLight) responded

    Thanks for the suggestion. However, capitals are so similar to commanders, it will probably never happen. It wouldn’t make sense to have two concepts in the game that are nearly identical.

13. Tactical Airlift

    This is a potential option to add to existing airlift parameters (like how long a diplomacy lasts etc.)

    The card setting would allow airlifts to be scheduled just like other orders during the turn.

    If the target territory has been captured during the turn, all troops are lost. If the airlifting troops are eliminated before the card is activated, then card is lost.

    Another idea for "tactical capability activation" could be the compounding of cards (save them up). So playing whatever number of cards together allows the option. But, this way, you are less sure if the enemy currently has the capacity.

    It would make for some crazy play :)

    This is a potential option to add to existing airlift parameters (like how long a diplomacy lasts etc.)

    The card setting would allow airlifts to be scheduled just like other orders during the turn.

    If the target territory has been captured during the turn, all troops are lost. If the airlifting troops are eliminated before the card is activated, then card is lost.

    Another idea for "tactical capability activation" could be the compounding of cards (save them up). So playing whatever number of cards together allows the option. But, this way, you are less sure if the enemy currently has… more

    1 vote

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

14. Extension to overridden bonuses

    Overridden bonuses are good, causing chaos on big maps like the US map, but the limit could be extended to 10-50k, because it can give even more chaos to what happens in the game. (Yes, I have a template for extreme overriden bonuses for the US lol)

    This would help for chaotic and fun games with this extension, and I think diplomacy games would work with this too. The only downside is that lag wouldn't be minimal, and there would probably be a lot of it. Other than though, putting a warning before putting overriden bonuses would be good.

    So yeah, that's my idea!

    Overridden bonuses are good, causing chaos on big maps like the US map, but the limit could be extended to 10-50k, because it can give even more chaos to what happens in the game. (Yes, I have a template for extreme overriden bonuses for the US lol)

    This would help for chaotic and fun games with this extension, and I think diplomacy games would work with this too. The only downside is that lag wouldn't be minimal, and there would probably be a lot of it. Other than though, putting a warning before putting overriden bonuses would be good.

    So… more

    1 vote

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

15. Add an Occupation mode

    This mode when checked will allow territories to be occupied instead of being instantly owned by the one who captured said territory allowing more depth in diplomacy games. This mode would work well in conjunction with Peace Treaties https://warlight.uservoice.com/forums/77051-warlight-features/suggestions/1088481-peace-treaties
    And would allow you to take said land in a peace treaty. If the land is not take in the peace treaty it would simply go back to the original owner and any other armies left in the territory will be transferred to the nearest territory owned by the occupier.

    Occupation of a territory will be shown with the original owners color as the base and diagonal lines (up, right like this "/") with the color of the occupier.

    Example: Blue had his territory taken over by Green, the territory that was take over would be Blue at the base with Green diagonal lines.

    Occupation of a Bonus would give a customizable amount of armies, from 100% of the Bonus armies ( which would give all the armies) to 0% (which would give none) Ex: a bonus is worth 5 armies and after being occupied with the occupied bonus setting at 50% would give 2.5 armies or 3 armies.

    This mode when checked will allow territories to be occupied instead of being instantly owned by the one who captured said territory allowing more depth in diplomacy games. This mode would work well in conjunction with Peace Treaties https://warlight.uservoice.com/forums/77051-warlight-features/suggestions/1088481-peace-treaties
    And would allow you to take said land in a peace treaty. If the land is not take in the peace treaty it would simply go back to the original owner and any other armies left in the territory will be transferred to the nearest territory owned by the occupier.

    Occupation of a territory will be shown with the original owners… more

    6 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

16. Heres 25 ideas for cards, units, and other gameplay features

    Cards:

    White-wash -Pick an enemy, they see all other enemies as the same color, but not allies or neutrals

    Trojan -pick an adjacent enemy territory. That territory gains half the troops it currently has this turn, but will lose 2/3 of the new total the turn after.

    Recycle -return a territory you own back to a neutral with double the amount of neutral armies it had on turn 1. Your income for this turn is increased by the number of armies that you had on the territory for this turn only.

    Quake -pick an adjacent territory, that territory and the ones adjacent to it (including any you own) are immobilized for 1 turn.

    Firewall -immune to sanction, diplomacy, gift, spy, surveillance, and reconnaissance cards for 1 turn.

    War Bonds -For the next 3 turns you gain an additional 10% income.

    Equality -For the next 2 turns, all players evenly split the total income of all players.

    Private Investigator -Locates enemy special units for 1 turn.

    Ravage -Pick a bonus. Its income is cut in half for 1 turn.

    Scarcity -All bonuses grant 1 income for 1 turn.

    Obliterate -pick a territory, it does not exist for 1 turn.

    Nap Time -all players cannot attack for 1 turn.

    Scramble -pick an enemy, their orders are ordered randomly.

    Social Media -Pick an enemy, the number of bonuses they control is presented to you, and if any of them are adjacent to you they become visible.

    Master Race -Controller Support.

    Units:

    Ambassador -Can be transferred to an ally. Can Die without the player being eliminated. Worth 4 armies.

    Synergist (Alternate name: Cheerleader) -Can Die without the player being eliminated. Worth 0 armies. Adjacent ally territories gain 5% of the armies currently there each turn.

    Squire -Can Die without the player being eliminated. Worth 2 armies.

    Avenger -Can Die without the player being eliminated. Worth 4 armies. Upon death an adjacent territory you control gains a squire.

    Scavenger -Can Die without the player being eliminated. Worth 0 armies. Upon defeating and taking control of a territory, gain an additional card piece.

    Gamer -Can Die without the player being eliminated. Worth 0 armies. Controller Support.

    Shroud -Can Die without the player being eliminated. Worth 0 armies. Fogs the territory its on preventing enemies from knowing whats there.

    Lycan -Can Die without the player being eliminated. Worth 1 army initially, but if attacked and lives, is worth 3 armies from then on.

    Saboteur (alternate name: Tea Party Member) -Can Die without the player being eliminated. Worth 0 armies. Reduces income by 5. Can be transferred to enemies.

    Features:

    Controller Support -Controller Support.

    Cards:

    White-wash -Pick an enemy, they see all other enemies as the same color, but not allies or neutrals

    Trojan -pick an adjacent enemy territory. That territory gains half the troops it currently has this turn, but will lose 2/3 of the new total the turn after.

    Recycle -return a territory you own back to a neutral with double the amount of neutral armies it had on turn 1. Your income for this turn is increased by the number of armies that you had on the territory for this turn only.

    Quake -pick an adjacent territory, that territory and the… more

    12 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    started  ·  AdminDanWL (Admin, WarLight) responded

    The Quake (know as Immobilize) and Recycle cards have been completed in mod "Custom Card Package 2"

17. Some random new card thoughts

    Agreed. Some new cards could be fun.

    Here's some I can think up on the spot, so imagine if we put so true thought into theses.

    Blitzkrieg, gives you a multiple attack option. So if you kill the territory the armies continue on to the next territory in the same turn. -Cool in games without the multi attack option

    Nuke. It kills bonus and makes it radioactive for 3 three turns. - Defensive or Offensive strategy

    Predator missile, like the paratroops but kills a territory instantly. - takes a super bonus out of the picture for one turn

    Iron Dome, prevents any cards form being played for a 2 turns or having a lasting effect. - So it'd kill diplomacy card if one was in affect or ruin somebody's reenforcement card. Also be smart to play right before getting a huge bonus

    Insurgency, makes player own territory look like a neutral. - Great for making an escape or having a piece of land look incognito in a heavy traffic area.

    PsyOps, makes a army look larger then they really are. - Scare people from attacking or scare them form defending.

    Guerrilla Warfare, opponent gets notified next turn all 1 army territories will be run over and taken back to neutral. - Forces a player to use his income where he wouldn't want to

    The Deserter, player can switch lowest income teammate with the other teams lowest income opponent in multiplayer games. - just a dirty card all around

    Custers Last Stand, kills any armies that attack it's bonus for one turn. - defensive card.

    Cyber Warfare, cause one order for every opponent to go haywire for a turn. So instead of a plus 8 on spot A it goes to spot C or instead of spot A attacking spot B
    Spot G attack spot H.

    I see some of these are already mentioned like Blitzkrieg and Airdrop. Heck I read a guys Zombie card and thought that was an awesome idea.

    I read another guys idea on my "Gurellia Warfare" were he wants an AI to come into play. That'd be awesome crazy. I'm not a card fan but some new cards could make card games more interesting.

    Agreed. Some new cards could be fun.

    Here's some I can think up on the spot, so imagine if we put so true thought into theses.

    Blitzkrieg, gives you a multiple attack option. So if you kill the territory the armies continue on to the next territory in the same turn. -Cool in games without the multi attack option

    Nuke. It kills bonus and makes it radioactive for 3 three turns. - Defensive or Offensive strategy

    Predator missile, like the paratroops but kills a territory instantly. - takes a super bonus out of the picture for one turn

    Iron Dome,… more

    1 vote

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close