864 results found

1. Secondary Open Seats

   Let the game host add another type of open seat with different prerequisites. Allow at least 3 types in a game. Make one of the prerequisites: from clan XY. If you are from clan XY and there is a game with an open seat with a prerequisite of being from clan XY, make the game pop in your games as if you were invited. Let players turn off the latest mentioned feature. You can hide some of this behind membership to increase its value.

   On diplo games, there are usually big slots which require more experienced players with lower boot chance. Currently, the host has to switch players manually, which is not only annoying for the host but can be a negative experience for the switched player. Making such slots an open slot with heightened prerequisites would solve that issue.

   Prerequisite from clan XY would let the host make a team game, where anybody can join team A, but team B is joinable by their own clan. Or make a game only joinable by own clan. This would increase the value of clans.

   Let the game host add another type of open seat with different prerequisites. Allow at least 3 types in a game. Make one of the prerequisites: from clan XY. If you are from clan XY and there is a game with an open seat with a prerequisite of being from clan XY, make the game pop in your games as if you were invited. Let players turn off the latest mentioned feature. You can hide some of this behind membership to increase its value.

   On diplo games, there are usually big slots which require more experienced players with lower boot… more

   22 votes

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. Matchmake Clan Wars based on individual ratings

   This proposal would make Clan Wars matches more enjoyable, Clan Wars more inclusive, and clans more robust.

   Clan Wars' performance is simply (# of matches played) * (win rate). This means an elevated win rate (>50%) has the same effect as a (win rate/50%) participation boost: a 30-member clan with a 75% win rate is as good as a 45-member 50% win rate clan.

   The problem Clan Wars' CW rating matchmaking causes here stems from a single rating not capturing a clan's skill well. Clans vary in skill: players significantly better or worse than their median clanmate get lopsided matches. Through their effect on rating, high-skill players in non-high-skill clans don't boost their clan's win rate significantly- their wins become their teammates' losses.

   At the aggregate, this means a very non-smooth distribution of win rates across clans: overall-high-skill clans break the matchmaking, while everyone else converges near 50%. This reduces parity: it's why the results have been so repetitive (with long dynasties). Only some clans benefit from high-skill players.

   This creates bad incentives for clans, which have historically invested in player development. High-skill players benefit from flocking together (like in Myth Busters or M'Hunters or the exodus from PKU58ers to MASTER) for CW rewards because in their own clans their high-skill means nothing: it's all-or-nothing, a step-function reward curve.

   Matchmaking based on individual ratings would make the return-on-skill curve more continuous, smoothen the win rate distribution across clans, consequently increase CW parity, and make individual CW matches less lopsided & more enjoyable. Some players join slots daily just to mostly lose or mostly win, because their clan's rating is far from their own skill level and they can't keep up with their opponents- where's the fun in that? FCC, a clan which declined sharply in skill, has also had its CW participation drop sharply because most of us just join games to get destroyed by opponents based on the clan's old rating.

   Clan Wars is meant to be an exciting competition for players regardless of their skill. The current discontinuity in clan win rates & return on skill, creating a few contender clans each season which are guaranteed to win if they can sustain high participation (while everyone else fights for lower spots because it takes a lot of effort to jump the chasm from 50% win rate to 60%+ when you can't climb incrementally, thanks to how CW rating-based-matchmaking works). This goes against the guiding principle of CW being fun for everyone, especially casual players who should be facing their peers instead of their much better clanmates'.

   Please, please, please use individual ratings for matchmaking so the competition become more fun for more people.

   This proposal would make Clan Wars matches more enjoyable, Clan Wars more inclusive, and clans more robust.

   Clan Wars' performance is simply (# of matches played) * (win rate). This means an elevated win rate (>50%) has the same effect as a (win rate/50%) participation boost: a 30-member clan with a 75% win rate is as good as a 45-member 50% win rate clan.

   The problem Clan Wars' CW rating matchmaking causes here stems from a single rating not capturing a clan's skill well. Clans vary in skill: players significantly better or worse than their median clanmate get lopsided matches.… more

   9 votes

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   2 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

3. Implement a ranking system/metric in public profile to highlight Idle performance (avg time to conquer map, points, etc)

   Implement a ranking system/metric in public profile to highlight Idle performance (avg time to conquer map, points, etc). I would like to be able to see and compare how my friends and other players are doing in Idle.

   2 votes

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. Extension to overridden bonuses

   Overridden bonuses are good, causing chaos on big maps like the US map, but the limit could be extended to 10-50k, because it can give even more chaos to what happens in the game. (Yes, I have a template for extreme overriden bonuses for the US lol)

   This would help for chaotic and fun games with this extension, and I think diplomacy games would work with this too. The only downside is that lag wouldn't be minimal, and there would probably be a lot of it. Other than though, putting a warning before putting overriden bonuses would be good.

   So yeah, that's my idea!

   Overridden bonuses are good, causing chaos on big maps like the US map, but the limit could be extended to 10-50k, because it can give even more chaos to what happens in the game. (Yes, I have a template for extreme overriden bonuses for the US lol)

   This would help for chaotic and fun games with this extension, and I think diplomacy games would work with this too. The only downside is that lag wouldn't be minimal, and there would probably be a lot of it. Other than though, putting a warning before putting overriden bonuses would be good.

   So… more

   1 vote

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

5. Idle "locate" feature

   On big maps using a lot of fogbuster reveals a lot of territories but looking at them to locate recipes or useful reward a is really annoying how not readable it can get on maps with 3000+territories

   I suggest to introduce this feature as a reward for the "stats" advancement: being able to locate visibile unconquered territories and bonuses sorting them out by reward (recipies, army camps, hospital, caches, powerups, ecc) in order to make maps more readable

   4 votes

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

6. Change the 1v1 Ladder starting rating to some value other than 0 (900-1300 would be great).

   Much of the problems that get blamed on Bayeselo are in fact simply because the initial rating on the 1v1 Ladder is 0. 0, unfortunately, does not mean "no rating." It means you start from the bottom and set off a vicious garbage-in-garbage-out cycle of volatile, exploitable, slow-to-converge Bayeselo ratings, because Bayeselo is conservative and will keep matching you at the bottom. This probably also depresses ladder participation, since players tend to leave at a very high rate when they win 4/5 of their first 5 games.

   Note that:
   - Bayeselo is relative so 0 isn't any more special a value than 100 or -300. On the 1v1 ladder, it just means "1500 points worse than the average player."
   - Every single new ladder player is significantly better than a 0 rating would imply. Players on a long boot streak hit 600-700. (In practice, an initial rating of 0 implies "worst player on the ladder" as the null hypothesis, hence the vicious cycle)
   - By my math the actual skill level at the ~25% percentile for new (first-time) ladder entrants is somewhere between 900 and 1300. You could also do 1500 because...
   - ... starting at the center (or close to it) on the rating distribution will help Bayeselo converge faster, so this won't just mean newbies start on boot streaks (especially since Bayeselo has an uncertainty parameter). Think binary search.

   for more details: https://www.warzone.com/Forum/641242?Offset=0

   Much of the problems that get blamed on Bayeselo are in fact simply because the initial rating on the 1v1 Ladder is 0. 0, unfortunately, does not mean "no rating." It means you start from the bottom and set off a vicious garbage-in-garbage-out cycle of volatile, exploitable, slow-to-converge Bayeselo ratings, because Bayeselo is conservative and will keep matching you at the bottom. This probably also depresses ladder participation, since players tend to leave at a very high rate when they win 4/5 of their first 5 games.

   Note that:
   - Bayeselo is relative so 0 isn't any more special a… more

   7 votes

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

7. Option (maybe even on by default) to disable all sounds except "new round"

   I love Warzone and I think it's a great game overall except the sounds.
   On the other hand one sound is very useful - the one telling me that it's my turn. I'd love to be able to turn all other off without the need of external browser plugins.

   3 votes

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

8. ui stuff

   I would like the following to be optional:
   camera zooming in and out (when watching orders or clicking orders)
   camera moving (when watching orders or clicking orders)
   deploying last army moving from deployment phase to attack/transfer phase

   4 votes

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

9. Is there any way to get back into a game that you were part of on a local profile after you sign into your accout?

   I was playing a game with some freinds on the app and wasn't logged into my actual account. I then proceeded to log in and the game I was playing disappeared from my games list. I tried logging back out to access the game but that did not make it appear.

   1 vote

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

10. Clan Wars Overhaul

    Full suggestion: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TxMqb7yxY8GPp2fP8B1T2su1is1JkGsGU08Mi-7yIdY/edit?usp=sharing

    Bundle of changes to improve activity in Clan Wars and make it more interesting for the strategic community. Changes are designed to work together (for example allowing players to join multiple slots every day without ELO-based ranking doesn't work well).

    Notable changes:
    -> players can join multiple slots every day
    -> no CW cap and clanless players can join CW
    -> improved matchmaking and template choice
    -> personal ELO system
    -> coin rewards and clan ranking based on personal ELO of active clanmates
    -> idle rewards based on activity and # of wins

    5 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

11. List Quick Match Templates on Start Page

    When going for Quick Match...the active templates are hidden. I woul like to see the active templates. Please show them on the start page. This is information under the button: https://www.warzone.com/MultiPlayer?Quickmatch=1# shows the templates.

    Please list this info on the start page. Thank you!

    3 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Edit…  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

12. Hi. Can you create something between local distribution and normal distribution, where income from linked bonuses would be calculated and co

    Hi. Can you create something between local distribution and normal distribution, where income from linked bonuses would be calculated and could be deployed only in this space? That way, it would be possible to tactic better, to create pockets in which the opponent could not deploy his entire income, but only the income from the bonuses in this pocket. I think it would be very interesting tactically.

    1 vote

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

13. Airlift cards with troop limit

    Airlift cards with unlimited amount of troops are unrealistic for diplomacy roleplay gameplay and benefit more the stronger players. Games with no airlifts allows for a different gameplay e.g. you can easily declare war on more powerful countries with colonies and just take the colonies without them being overwhelmed by the entirety of their force or it makes it easier to declare on someone who's not expecting it, so you need to manage your borders better. It can however feel a bit limiting to have no airlifts. Airlifts with troop limits would allow for a compromise between the 2 gameplays.

    Surely it can be also applied similarly to allow different strategies in non-diplomacy games.

    Airlift cards with unlimited amount of troops are unrealistic for diplomacy roleplay gameplay and benefit more the stronger players. Games with no airlifts allows for a different gameplay e.g. you can easily declare war on more powerful countries with colonies and just take the colonies without them being overwhelmed by the entirety of their force or it makes it easier to declare on someone who's not expecting it, so you need to manage your borders better. It can however feel a bit limiting to have no airlifts. Airlifts with troop limits would allow for a compromise between the 2 gameplays.

    … more

    3 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

14. Add a new setting to limit the amount of real time games a player is in

    Keep running into people that are playing multiple real time games especially on large maps and end up taking at least 7+ mins on first 10 turns. There should be a setting to prevent people joining games when they are in multiple real time games as these people are wasting everyone else's time.

    3 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

15. Easy sharing button after a game has finished

    I like to share my nicest victories with my friends via WhatsApp.

    It take a lot of click to het the game url in the app. I just want a easy sharing option in the popup when the game is finished!

    1 vote

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

16. award xp in ffa to more than just the winner

    in large ffa 40+ there's something to be said for finishing 2nd or even 5th out of 300. there should be xp awarded to the to top 3-5% of players in games. obviously less the lower down a player finishes

    3 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

17. Winner/Coins in round robin tournaments

    Right know the winner of a round robin tournament get's nothing but bragging rights. It would be nice to create round robin tournaments were the 1st, 2nd and 3rd place received coins. there could be a tie break system where first tie breaker is head to head and second is win/loss verses anyone over 50% for the tournament, if there's still a tie the players can split the coins

    3 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

18. See number of territories a bonus has in Custumize army settings => Customize Bonus Values
    1 vote

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

19. Seasonal Clan Wars Templates

    Add in additional clans wars template that would get rotated by clan wars season. Either hand picked by Fizzer or voted in by community like Map of the week. Could limit votes to cw players only or those in top number of clans to limit troll votes.

    Also if updating clan wars to be more dynamic, consider most played seasonal templates as being promoted to permanent while least played former "permanent" maps get relegated out of rotation. Maybe have rule that this has to happen in consecutive seasons to limit too much churn

    5 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

20. Clan Wars Matchmaking - Randomize the Can Internal Matchmaking Part

    This proposal is NOT about the Clan Wars matchmaking algorithm to match clans of similar skill level but about the less known "feature" of the account age of the players influencing the matchmaking. When multiple players from a clan join a template it is not random which player gets matched against which opponent but the player with the oldest account gets the highest ranked opponent clan and the player with the youngest account gets the lowest ranked opponent clan.

    This has several disadvantages:
    - The top performer list of clans become meaningless since the younger accounts get way easier games.
    - Younger accounts from lower rated clans are more prone to fail to get a match than the older accounts in that clan.
    - Some players who like the same sort of templates and timeslots get matched an excessive amount against each other.
    - Players with younger accounts get bored and have no real need to improve since they win easily anyways.

    Suggestion: Randomize the player list.

    This proposal is NOT about the Clan Wars matchmaking algorithm to match clans of similar skill level but about the less known "feature" of the account age of the players influencing the matchmaking. When multiple players from a clan join a template it is not random which player gets matched against which opponent but the player with the oldest account gets the highest ranked opponent clan and the player with the youngest account gets the lowest ranked opponent clan.

    This has several disadvantages:
    - The top performer list of clans become meaningless since the younger accounts get way easier games.… more

    6 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    started  ·  AdminFizzer (WarLight Creator, WarLight) responded

    The order of players within each clan is now randomized.  Thanks for the suggestion!