864 results found

1. Flexible Teams in Custom Scenario

   Allow for flexible teams in custom scenarios. An example is during the Napoleon Era in which Prussia switched sides.

   8 votes

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. Clan Wars: Guarantee Small Earth in every time slot

   Small Earth 1 wasteland or Small Earth Auto Dist should be in every time slot.

   Right now it's possible for the following time slots to occur:
   MME Commanders LD No Cards by itself
   MME Commanders LD No Cards, MA MME Light Fog LD, and Strat 2v2

   With the current design, even a 3-template slot could have templates that are unpopular and non-viable (the MME LD templates due to how incredibly long they take, Strat 2v2 because it's infeasible for most clans to have 2 players on CW at once willing to play that template and also because it takes ages too). Meanwhile, SE templates- particularly SE1W and SEAD- are overwhelmingly popular and drive up participation in a slot. They're the most popular templates among casual players, quick, and well-suited to RT play.

   Many participants do not have the luxury of checking multiple slots a day. If SE were guaranteed in every slot- then the vast majority of players would have at least one template per slot that would actually make Clan Wars enjoyable for them.

   Think of it like a pizza party you want a lot of people to attend: you always have cheese and pepperoni, cause if people show up and their options are Canadian bacon-anchovies-pineapple-jalapeno, cauliflower & pickles, and deep dish Swedish banana pizza, you're gonna have less and less people show up to your pizza parties over time. Please always order cheese and pepperoni because almost everyone who eats that cauliflower and pickles pizza doesn't actually like it- they just settle for it cause you gave them no good options. And don't just tell them to keep coming to the next pizza party on the off chance it has cheese or pepperoni, cause that's incredibly exhausting.

   Small Earth 1 wasteland or Small Earth Auto Dist should be in every time slot.

   Right now it's possible for the following time slots to occur:
   MME Commanders LD No Cards by itself
   MME Commanders LD No Cards, MA MME Light Fog LD, and Strat 2v2

   With the current design, even a 3-template slot could have templates that are unpopular and non-viable (the MME LD templates due to how incredibly long they take, Strat 2v2 because it's infeasible for most clans to have 2 players on CW at once willing to play that template and also because it takes ages… more

   8 votes

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   2 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

3. On profile page a link with the games the player currently playing

   On profile page of each player there should be a link with the games he/she currently playing.
   You can also spectate this games but you should not be able to see through fog of war

   7 votes

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   2 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. maximum army by territories

   Be able to choose an option to add a cap for maximum army by territory

   7 votes

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   3 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

5. Random Map 1 v 1 Ladder

   My idea:

   1. Create a Random Map 1 v 1 Ladder (and keep the current one).

   2. Use 10-20 good maps and settings. For example:

   1: Current 1 v 1 Ladder's Map/Settings
   2: Europe Map/No Cards/12 Starting Spots
   3: 1 v 1 Ladder Map, No Cards
   4: Other suitable maps/settings for good, competitive, fair 1 v 1 duels

   1. How it would work: Everything would be the same as the current 1 v 1 Ladder except one thing -- each game the map/settings would be randomly (ie, automatically) selected from among the 10-20 predetermined maps/settings.

   My reasoning:

   1. Fairness: Some players are better in games with cards, others without cards. Players have map preferences & advantages. Random maps/settings would create a more equal playing field.
   2. Better Measure of Overall 1 v 1 Ability: I can't remember the last time somebody beat me in a pure (no outside help, equal bonuses) 1 on 1 within a 3 v 3 game. But people who would have no chance against me in such a battle can beat me on the 1 v 1 ladder settings. This makes me believe that the luck (of positioning, pick order, move order, cards, etc.) makes for an imperfect 1 v 1 battle. Chance, happenstance, luck, map/settings advantages should not be so influential. Random maps/settings would help: one's overall ladder rating would be a clearer indication of the player's true 1 v 1 abilities, since the maps and settings would be different for each game. Maybe Player A dominates the current ladder settings. Player B dominates map #2. Player C dominates map #3. Etc. Playing 10-20 maps/settings would be a better measure of who is the best overall 1 v 1 player.

   My idea:

   1. Create a Random Map 1 v 1 Ladder (and keep the current one).

   2. Use 10-20 good maps and settings. For example:

   1: Current 1 v 1 Ladder's Map/Settings
   2: Europe Map/No Cards/12 Starting Spots
   3: 1 v 1 Ladder Map, No Cards
   4: Other suitable maps/settings for good, competitive, fair 1 v 1 duels

   1. How it would work: Everything would be the same as the current 1 v 1 Ladder except one thing -- each game the map/settings would be randomly (ie, automatically) selected from among the 10-20 predetermined maps/settings.

   My reasoning:

   1. Fairness: Some players are better in… more
   7 votes

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

6. Weakest Players Reinforcement Bonus

   At a certain stage in a game, one team or player usually has such overwhelming superiority that it's extremely hard for the others to come back - especially when this is a new player against someone more seasoned.

   Perhaps there could be an option to make reinforcement cards more generous to players who are far behind - so if the most powerful player has four times the territories of the weakest, say, then the weakest player will receive two or three times as many armies for playing a reinforcement card. (Perhaps their people are gripped with a desperate fervour to save their land...)

   This would motivate people to keep playing even when one player has become very strong: it would give them a chance to strike back, to break up the large swathes of territory held by the hegemonic player, and perhaps restore some balance. It would reduce the sense of grind at the end, as the most powerful player takes several turns to complete a victory that was inevitable long before.

   At a certain stage in a game, one team or player usually has such overwhelming superiority that it's extremely hard for the others to come back - especially when this is a new player against someone more seasoned.

   Perhaps there could be an option to make reinforcement cards more generous to players who are far behind - so if the most powerful player has four times the territories of the weakest, say, then the weakest player will receive two or three times as many armies for playing a reinforcement card. (Perhaps their people are gripped with a desperate fervour to… more

   7 votes

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

7. Replacement of Inactive Players in Tournaments

   Hey there!
   I am currently playing in a Asia tournament 4x4. It took ages till the tournament started and every team except one had at least one completely inactive player in their ranks. Now my team is winning, one was inactive, the other got auto booted but is still playing. Were playing (or atm I am playing) against a team where all three players are active. Yet it would be kinda strange to surrender right before winning so three active players can continue playing.

   This is why I would suggest the option to remove an inactive player froma tournament, much like it was suggested in the idea with the following name: "Player "Active/Inactive" Status- where inactive players automatically forfeit all open games."

   But with the chance to add someone new to the team, so the team has three players again. It would probably be kinda unfair to be able to add ANY player, but maybe a player that was on another team in the same round. We for example would like to exchange our inactive player for one of the opposing team. He would also like that - we just signed up on another tournament as one team.

   Problem with the permanent inactive players in tournament is also, that we need to wait several days till we can click "force join" and then another 3 days till we can boot the inactive player again, delaying the start of the second tournament round by around 1 week.

   I hope you like the idea and that it is maybe possible to add something like that.

   Cheers
   Wooze

   Hey there!
   I am currently playing in a Asia tournament 4x4. It took ages till the tournament started and every team except one had at least one completely inactive player in their ranks. Now my team is winning, one was inactive, the other got auto booted but is still playing. Were playing (or atm I am playing) against a team where all three players are active. Yet it would be kinda strange to surrender right before winning so three active players can continue playing.

   This is why I would suggest the option to remove an inactive player froma tournament, much… more

   7 votes

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

8. Flanking Bonus

   Flanking bonus: if a territory is attacked from more than one adjacent territory, then the attacking territory(ies) (excluding the one with the most soldiers) get(s) a temporary kill rate boost.
   If all of them have the same amount of soldiers, then a random one doesn't get the boost (this would be the army attacking head on).

   7 votes

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

9. "Allow uneven teams" game setting

   This would add a game setting that game creators can set when creating a game. This would allow WarLight to know when you're making a game with uneven teams and prevent cases where the game starts uneven unintentionally.

   Most of the time you'd leave this off, except when you explicitly wanted to set up a game with uneven teams.

   7 votes

   vote vote vote

   vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

10. Maintain custom scenario when a map updates

    This would allow WarLight to merge a custom scenario between different versions of a map. Today, if you build a custom scenario, and save it as a template, then the creator of that map updates his map, WarLight can't transfer the custom scenario to the new map version. This item would allow that possibility.

    If the new map version adds new territories, removes territories, or changes the ID of a territory it still could mess up your scenario, so even after this item is completed it will still be necessary to review the scenario after it's moved to ensure it's still what you expect.

    This would allow WarLight to merge a custom scenario between different versions of a map. Today, if you build a custom scenario, and save it as a template, then the creator of that map updates his map, WarLight can't transfer the custom scenario to the new map version. This item would allow that possibility.

    If the new map version adds new territories, removes territories, or changes the ID of a territory it still could mess up your scenario, so even after this item is completed it will still be necessary to review the scenario after it's moved to ensure it's… more

    7 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

11. A Navy Card

    Often, in warlight, attacks happen across bodies of water. In order to make it more realistic, you should only be able to attack across water if you have some kind of navy, possibly by obtaining some sort of navy card in some way. How I speculate a setting like this could be put into the game is that a new setting is added to map design, which would allow map creators to decide which connections would be maritime. Then, when creating a game, one could turn the card on or off. It would be entirely optional. This would certainly change the game a lot, but I believe it would be for a positive one.

    Often, in warlight, attacks happen across bodies of water. In order to make it more realistic, you should only be able to attack across water if you have some kind of navy, possibly by obtaining some sort of navy card in some way. How I speculate a setting like this could be put into the game is that a new setting is added to map design, which would allow map creators to decide which connections would be maritime. Then, when creating a game, one could turn the card on or off. It would be entirely optional. This would certainly change… more

    7 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

12. Option to delete mail threads

    My concern is about mail threads. When you make one, or somebody sends you one, it stays there forever, with no way to get rid of it. It's gotten pretty aggravating sometimes, because people have sent me junk mail, and it's cluttering up my list of mail threads. I tend to be an organized person, and I don't like it that I can't get rid of the trash threads at all. There's still mail threads from people that I haven't spoken to in months, and now the more people I befriend on here, the more mail threads I collect, and the more cluttered everything is. I would like to know if there is any way you could change this, because other people have expressed that they don't like it either. Thank you for reading this, and I hope somebody can fix this problem........

    My concern is about mail threads. When you make one, or somebody sends you one, it stays there forever, with no way to get rid of it. It's gotten pretty aggravating sometimes, because people have sent me junk mail, and it's cluttering up my list of mail threads. I tend to be an organized person, and I don't like it that I can't get rid of the trash threads at all. There's still mail threads from people that I haven't spoken to in months, and now the more people I befriend on here, the more mail threads I collect, and… more

    7 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

13. Fortifications Card: Grants a defense bonus to a single territory against an attacking force. The bonus is base on a percentage of your te

    Fortifications Card: Grants a defense bonus to a single territory against an attacking force. The bonus is base on a percentage of your territory’s current strength.

    Special Forces Card: Grants an offensive bonus to a single territory during an attack order against an enemy held territory. The offensive bonus is based on a percentage of your territory’s current strength.

    Raiding Card: Steals a percentage of an enemy economy and grants their loss to your next turn’s income.

    Foreign Aid Card: Allows the nation that plays this card to donate a specified number of their troops to another nation’s income.

    Concealment Card: Camouflages a percentage of troops in a player controlled territory from enemy view so that they may not deduce your strength in that particular territory. Allow players to swap and/or donate their cards to other players.

    Phantom Armies Card: Artificially inflates your current troop strength in a territory by a percentage. In doing so, the enemy believes that you have more forces at your disposal than you actually own.

    Scorched Earth Card: Turns the current armies in a player-controlled territory into neutral armies after increasing them by a percentage. The designated territory is also given a negative bonus for several turns.

    Fortifications Card: Grants a defense bonus to a single territory against an attacking force. The bonus is base on a percentage of your territory’s current strength.

    Special Forces Card: Grants an offensive bonus to a single territory during an attack order against an enemy held territory. The offensive bonus is based on a percentage of your territory’s current strength.

    Raiding Card: Steals a percentage of an enemy economy and grants their loss to your next turn’s income.

    Foreign Aid Card: Allows the nation that plays this card to donate a specified number of their troops to another nation’s income.

    Concealment… more

    7 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

14. Edit bonuses received for territories directly on the map (Custom Scenarios)

    When designing a custom scenario, it is currently rather difficult to change the number of income received for different territories. You have to leave the map page and go to the alphabetical listing of all the territories, then enter in the desired number. This is not entirely unworkable, but it is not as efficient as it could be. To improve it, I suggest that there be an option to enter in the income for each territory directly on to the map. This way, you don't have to switch between screens and it doesn't take as long to find the territory you want to change.

    When designing a custom scenario, it is currently rather difficult to change the number of income received for different territories. You have to leave the map page and go to the alphabetical listing of all the territories, then enter in the desired number. This is not entirely unworkable, but it is not as efficient as it could be. To improve it, I suggest that there be an option to enter in the income for each territory directly on to the map. This way, you don't have to switch between screens and it doesn't take as long to find the territory… more

    7 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

15. Give the Host the ability to boot a player regardless of boot time.

    Give the Host the ability to boot a player regardless of boot time.

    Sometimes I play a game (usually a diplomacy) and one (or a group of) player(s) is disrupting the game and flouting the rules.

    7 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

16. High stakes coins games

    I am playing high stakes poker for a living. It is a huge community and we constantly look for things/game to bet on. Warlight is a strategic game and even if it needs lots of security (against bots which might beat the game quite easily) it would bring lots of poker players in there if there were high stakes games.

    i don't understand why the highest coin game is worth 10dollars or so. Why don't you put games from 1 dollar up to 5000 dollars ? to make it easier, you should put less map, maybe 3 (1v1 real time world map of course!) and few choices of buy in : 1, 5, 10, 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000 and 2000euro games ?! (REAL TIME !) the fact it is on many days attracts less player, we need ACTION !

    with less rake for those game (2 or 3%) i guaranty you would bring lots of gamblers, you (warlight) would win more money (due to the rake) and the community overall (which is skilled) would be able to make a living from this game !!

    WHY NOT ?

    there would be coaching site etc, the only thing to work hard on is to ensure players don't use bots to win money ...

    UPVOTE ! thanks

    I am playing high stakes poker for a living. It is a huge community and we constantly look for things/game to bet on. Warlight is a strategic game and even if it needs lots of security (against bots which might beat the game quite easily) it would bring lots of poker players in there if there were high stakes games.

    i don't understand why the highest coin game is worth 10dollars or so. Why don't you put games from 1 dollar up to 5000 dollars ? to make it easier, you should put less map, maybe 3 (1v1 real time… more

    7 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

17. Swiss-system tournaments

    More details here:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss-system_tournament

    7 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

18. Ability to sort community levels by map and settings

    I would like to be able to sort the community levels by map type and settings. It would help me to find user made games that I like better, and it would help me in making my own levels, because I could look to see how using a certain setting has affected other games that already exist.

    7 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

19. Fixed teams for coin games

    You can already make fixed teams for regular games. One must ask, why can’t we also do this for coin games from the coins tab? Who wants to play a strategic 2v2 with randoms? Few people are willing to stake their precious coins on the backs of random teammates; it would be approaching gambling at this point. Please, we need to be able to choose who is in our team for coin team games. I don’t think this should be a hard feature to add; I mean, after all it IS already a thing in regular games, how hard should it be to port the same feature to coin games? thanks

    You can already make fixed teams for regular games. One must ask, why can’t we also do this for coin games from the coins tab? Who wants to play a strategic 2v2 with randoms? Few people are willing to stake their precious coins on the backs of random teammates; it would be approaching gambling at this point. Please, we need to be able to choose who is in our team for coin team games. I don’t think this should be a hard feature to add; I mean, after all it IS already a thing in regular games, how hard should… more

    7 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

20. New local deployment type

    The idea is if someone has all income connected they can deploy all armies anywhere they wish but if they have income that is from two different bonuses split up with no connection they could only deploy the income locally within connected bonuses.

    7 votes

    vote vote vote

    vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close